Current:Home > FinanceNorth Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place -Pinnacle Profit Strategies
North Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place
View
Date:2025-04-12 17:45:04
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A North Carolina appeals court ruled Tuesday that local leaders who refused calls to remove a Confederate monument from outside a county courthouse acted in a constitutional manner and kept in place the statue at its longtime location in accordance with state law.
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld a trial court judge’s decision to side with Alamance County and its commissioners over the 30 foot (9.1 meter)-tall statue, which features a Confederate infantryman perched at the top. The state NAACP, the Alamance NAACP chapter, and other groups and individuals had sued the county and its leaders in 2021 after the commissioners rejected calls to take the statue down.
Confederate monuments in North Carolina, as elsewhere nationwide, were a frequent focal point for racial inequality protests in the late 2010s, and particularly in 2020 following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. North Carolina legislators enacted a law in 2015 that limits when an “object of remembrance” such as a military monument can be relocated.
The lawsuit’s plaintiffs said the county and the commissioners violated the state constitution by exercising discriminatory intent to protect a symbol of white supremacy outside the historic Alamance County Courthouse, thus creating the appearance of racial prejudice there.
In the opinion, Court of Appeals Chief Judge Chris Dillon wrote that the county commissioners lacked authority under the 2015 law to remove the statue. He also said the county manager’s email to commissioners in June 2020, in which he asked them to consider removing the monument out of concern for protesters’ safety, did not qualify for an exception to that law.
“At all times, the Monument Protection Law required the County to leave the Monument in its current place,” Dillon wrote. He added that a provision in the state constitution intended to ensure state courts are open to the public doesn’t prohibit the placement of objects of historical remembrance in and around a courthouse. The courthouse monument was dedicated in 1914.
“Indeed, in many courthouses and other government buildings across our State and nation, there are depictions of historical individuals who held certain views in their time many today would find offensive,” Dillon wrote.
Judges Donna Stroud and Valerie Zachary joined in the opinion.
Even with the 2015 law, Confederate monuments in North Carolina have been taken down in recent years, sometimes through force.
In 2018, protesters tore down a Confederate statue known as “Silent Sam” at the University of North Carolina campus at Chapel Hill. Statues of soldiers from the North Carolina Confederate Monument on the old Capitol grounds in Raleigh came down in June 2020. Gov. Roy Cooper, citing public safety, directed that the remainder of the monument and two others on Capitol grounds be removed.
The state Supreme Court is currently considering litigation stemming from a 2021 decision by the Asheville City Council to dismantle an obelisk honoring Civil War-era Gov. Zebulon Vance.
veryGood! (28355)
Related
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Tens of thousands still without power following powerful nor’easter in New England
- Proof Modern Family's Jeremy Maguire Is All Grown Up 4 Years After Playing Joe Pritchett
- Kurt Cobain remembered on 30th anniversary of death by daughter Frances Bean
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Connecticut pulls away from Alabama in Final Four to move one win from repeat title
- Q&A: The Outsized Climate and Environmental Impacts of Ohio’s 2024 Senate Race
- A 4.8 magnitude earthquake shook the East Coast. When was the last quake in New Jersey, NYC?
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- State Republicans killed an Indiana city’s lawsuit to stop illegal gun sales. Why?
Ranking
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Grab a Gold Glass for All This Tea on the Love Is Blind Casting Process
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suggests Jan. 6 prosecutions politically motivated, says he wants to hear every side
- Miami-area shootout leaves security guard and suspect dead, police officer and 6 others injured
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- 50 love quotes to express how you feel: 'Where there is love there is life'
- Sonequa Martin-Green bids farewell to historic role on Star Trek: Discovery
- What Final Four games are today? Breaking down the NCAA Tournament semifinals of March Madness
Recommendation
Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
Attn: Foodies! Shop Sur La Table’s Epic Warehouse Sale, Including 65% off Le Creuset, Staub & More
South Carolina coach Dawn Staley thinks Iowa's Caitlin Clark needs a ring to be the GOAT
Pat Sajak's final 'Wheel of Fortune' episode is revealed: When the host's farewell will air
Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
State Republicans killed an Indiana city’s lawsuit to stop illegal gun sales. Why?
Foul or no foul? That's the challenge for officials trying to referee Purdue big man Zach Edey
New York City to pay $17.5 million to settle suit over forcing women to remove hijabs for mug shots